A flow of international criticism against the Zionist Entity

Forces of different political and social trends are participating in this international campaign, as well as several Jewish, European, American forces and communities. Also, organizations, associations and Christian churches are actively contributing to activate it.

In fact, the Durban Conference of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) was a starting point in the flow of global criticism against the Zionist entity and its racist policies towards the Palestinian people and the Arab and Islamic peoples that are neighboring the Zionist entity. After that conference, severe criticisms and denunciations against that entity and against its overall racist policies were being addressed one after the other.
The Zionist entity has enjoyed since being established strong immunity against all forms of criticism, and the West European countries defended it in the face of the criticism that was addressed against it by human rights organizations and international bodies that belong to the United Nations such as the Amnesty International (AI) and others.

The beginning of the flow of international criticism had been launched from the Durban conference of non-governmental associations and organizations, which was held in the city of Durban in South Africa; it is the conference that came out with a set of recommendations that condemn the racist policies of the Zionist entity, such as the Apartheid Wall.

In the next interlude of the Durban Conference, the flow of criticism against the Zionist entity mounted, the number of countries and international organizations participating in addressing the criticism increased, and the balance of the Zionist entity on the international level had started to retreat with the decrease of the world’s trust in general and Europe in particular in the justice of the Zionist project in Palestine. This truth was embodied in the public opinion survey, which was conducted in April 2006 in fifteen European countries. The key question in that survey was: Which state poses the greatest threat to the international peace and security, and the answer was that the Zionist entity is the biggest threat to peace and security in the world. The ratio of the supporters of this viewpoint reached about 60 percent of the total respondents. However, what is strange is that a number of the European countries that were known as strong supporters of the Zionist entity such as Netherlands adopted this viewpoint with a high proportion amounted to 40 percent.

Earlier in Britain, a campaign calling for boycotting the Zionist entity at the university and academic related levels was launched, because of its occupation of the Palestinian land and continuing its occupation and suppression of the Palestinian people. This campaign had been launched from Britain in the summer of 2002 during the period of the second Palestinian uprising (intifada), at the time when the entity re-occupied the West Bank, led by Sharon.

On May 2006, the flow of criticism moved from Europe to Canada; where twenty-one Canadian organizations boycotted the Zionist entity, and church, commercial, and trade union organizations have involved in this campaign. According to the declared resolution of the Canadian organizations, support was given to the Palestinian cause for several months, and this activity was concluded in the city of Ottawa in the union that represents the major trade unions of Canada, which represent in turn 200 thousand workers. The chairwoman of the union said that the Zionist entity is conducting a racist policy very similar to the apartheid regime in South Africa, and thus we should not stop our boycott to this state until the Palestinians enjoy their right of return and self determination.

The Zionist successive abuses and violations have exposed the Zionist entity before the eyes of the world with all its horror and deformity as merely a racist entity that is far from all the elements of democracy and the claims of equality and human rights, and free of any content of freedom and justice.

Hence, after the Zionist entity lost all the cosmetic facial artificial features, it started its frantic attempts to restore its old image that was hiding behind all the truly racist ugly features and practices. In theory, the difficult problem faced by the entity these days, especially after its racist nature was being known by everyone, and after it became unable to change its racist essence, is that it is finally trying to change its external appearance while retaining all its racist fascist characteristics and practices.

The means used by the Zionists are nothing more than external retouches that do not change anything of the essence of Zionism; one of those means for example is utilizing the voices of beautiful women, including the picture of the Kadima chairwoman Tzipi Livni, pictures of women in bathing suits, and the picture of Miss Sea in the Zionist entity, and that is how the Zionists are trying these days to cover the ugliness of their entity by the bodies of semi-naked women.