This way Syria responds!

A set of positions that reflect the disappointment of those who adopted them, their anger because of that frustration, and their explicit or obscure confession by words or by behavior of the negative consequences of their aggressive acts were all recorded in only one week on the front of aggression. 

Let’s start with the incident that took place when they kicked Lakhdar Brahimi out under the title “accepting the resignation”, which is in fact dispensing with the services due to a shortfall in achieving the task. Here we can mention that since the early days of the appointment of Brahimi, succeeding Kofi Annan in managing the Syrian file on behalf of the UN, we were sure that this person did not come to achieve the peace and security of Syria and did not come to preserve the Syrian blood, money and sovereignty at all, but his real role was to invest the bloodshed and destruction perpetrated by the terrorists of the front of aggression in order to achieve the U.S. goals. In other words, and to be more accurate, Brahimi came to switch the terrorist crimes in the field of Syria on the table of negotiation under the flag of the United Nations, under which “the league of the Arab ewes” seek shelter, so as to turn Syria from its strategic current rank into an opposite rank where it would be attached to the U.S. policy in a political process that imposes on Syria a group of agents and spies on behalf of the rulers of Syria or the new authority of Syria. 

However, Syria disappointed the plan of the aggressor, established its rights, and aborted the fraudulent maneuvers, where their last chapters were in Geneva II. It survived despite the American mines being planted and exposed Brahimi in his mission, to the extent that made him realize that following the objective and professional honest path in the peaceful negotiation would lead to opposite results different than those wanted by the side that recruited him. Thus, he rushed to stop the negotiation and to disrupt the international peace process, and he went out of the scene to declare his failure in the task and to confirm the stability of Syria in its success in the confrontation. 

Then we come to mention the Saudi position, where dramatic repercussions and changes were witnessed and the Syrian field was the main reason for those events. Since more than one year and a half, Saudi Arabia became in charge of the file of the aggression on Syria after Qatar and Turkey, under direct American supervision, and handed the trilateral file over to Saud al-Faisal, Bandar bin Sultan, and Sultan bin Salman, who distributed the political, security, and military roles among them, and pledged America to achieve their goals in Syria in only a few months to present to Brahimi a Syrian field that has a terrorist likelihood that would enable him to utilize it in politics and negotiation. 

Days, weeks, and months passed, as well as the whole year, and the capabilities of the insurgents and terrorists were consumed. The outdoor cries of Saud al-Faisal were never useful, Bandar bin Sultan’s intelligence tours changed nothing, and the management of Salman bin Sultan to Jordan’s operations room has failed to stop the advance of the Arab Syrian Army along with the allies and the supportive forces. This progress began in the Quseir in an ascending way where the Syrian achievements accumulated since they were carried out according to very well planned strategy and plans that achieved impressive victories and restored to the bosom of the state the most important areas of strategic influence. These achievements drew a field scene that can never be interpreted wrongly and that confirms that the aggression on Syria failed strategically, and is fading in terms of the agents. What remains is to be able to carry on with its security and military operations, especially after the aggression turned from a war of change into a war of attrition, and after acknowledging its failure in the first war. 

These results required firing those who were responsible for the failure, and after retiring the two Qatari Hamads, also the two Saudis (Bandar and Salman) were also retired and only Saud al-Faisal is now hesitate, for they will dispense with his services in the process of re-installing and redistributing power in Saudi Arabia. Based upon this process, each of those who were within the team of planning and implementing the aggression on Syria will be excluded so as to bring those who are more capable of implementing a strategy of openness, of determining the losses, and of saving what is remaining of the particles of the vital strategic Saudi space in the region. In other words, opening up to Iran, participating in Lebanon, trying to touch gestures in Iraq, and having a limited dream in Syria. 

As for the League that has been named as an Arab League before the separation from the Syrian part, and even though it does not deserve to be mentioned or to discuss its positions for the lack of its weight originally, we find that it is not wrong if we rapidly had a look at its general secretary, who led the campaign of attacking Syria from his rank and went too far in pushing the UN Security Council to issue a resolution under Chapter VII to authorize the NATO to intervene militarily in Syria so as to destroy it as it destroyed Libya at the request of that League as well. He candidly admits today that the League has failed in its plans and in its mission, as it has also failed to achieve the change wanted by colonialism which is taking it as a tool to achieve its desires in the Arab World. His confession came today to integrate with the scene of those whom we were talking about when they were scrambling in their defeats and their heads and ranks have been ruled out and Syria remained stuck to its pride, dignity, and independence. 

Yet, what is more important in this scene is what emerged from the positions in the corridors of the West from Europe to America, where some tours, meetings, and conferences took place to conspire against Syria, and they all produced the income that say that the West is afraid of the Syrian successive achievements that are different in terms of the complexions and trends. Thus, this leads us to say that those achievements have halted the aggression and they are on track without fearing any threat or intimidation. In fact, the closure of Syria’s consular offices in the United States and giving the offices of the terrorists a diplomatic status, the so-called the coalition of the Syrian opposition, will not affect Syria for there is no legal value for this step and will not affect it at any level.
Moreover, threatening to increase the arming of the terrorists or developing it in terms of the quality and the quantity is not something new and this did not achieve in the past the desired goals and its circumstances are now tougher. Preventing the Syrians from the elections in Europe will not stop the presidential elections and will not change anything in the scene, but this is an additional implied testify that show that the West fear the Syrian ballot boxes, even if they were opened in Europe itself. Threatening to reject the results of the electoral process will not make any difference and everyone knows that the West since the beginning of the crisis has attacked Syria, claiming the fall of the legitimacy of the president, but its announcement did not affect Syria; its president has continued in his rank leading the country and following-up the defeat of those who attacked his country. 

Syria has responded to those positions and aggressive maneuvers that have multiple formats in a way that achieve the objectives of its war of defense on two main routes: 
-    The first is a field route: the significant Syrian achievements have been accumulated, which began one year ago and have changed the direction of the scene. After the Kalamoun, Homs and the Gota, the confrontations in the last hours were in the southern front between Daraa and Al-Qunaitra and those confrontations led to regaining control over more than one site and base and dropped the Israeli dream to establish the security zone in the Golan Heights and to form the Army of agents in it. This also prevented the terrorists from achieving a connection between Daraa and Al-Qunaitra and made the southern front become controlled by the Syrian decision and domination what makes this front become out of the circle of danger and threat and add it to the preceding fronts that became safe and secured.

This achievement has been reinforced by the confusion of the rivalry terrorists, by their fighting, and by shedding their own blood, as happened yesterday between the so-called the ‘Nusra Front’, Daesh, and the Free Syrian Terror Army. 

-    The second is a political-legal route: it is actively used through a strategy that has a dual paths; the path that leads to reconciliation that might extinguish the fire, shrink the spaces of confrontation and loss in the war of attrition, and regain those who strayed back to the homeland and who were convinced that they should return back to it, while the second path is the most important path now and is represented in preparing for the presidential election by the Syrian people in all places and everywhere, at home and abroad, (with the exception of those who have been prevented by the terrorists in Ar-Raqqah and by the colonizers in the West from participating in it). It should be an election in favor of liberating the country and achieving its independence, dignity, and its independent decision before being an election to choose the head of the state. 

The next presidential election is truly one part of defending Syria, where the Syrian people will be able through it to say to the colonial West: “We are the free Syrians choosing our president and affirming our identity according to what we want and any force in the world will not be able to impose on us things that we do not want or to issue an resolution or decision on our behalf”. This confirms that the Syrian people would give legitimacy to the president that they will chose, and that no legitimacy comes from outside the border.