0
Saturday 18 January 2014 - 07:49

The Israeli penetration in Lebanon and Syria through Central Asian consuls and diplomats!!

Story Code : 342313
The Israeli penetration in Lebanon and Syria through Central Asian consuls and diplomats!!
Some agents wanted to travel to the Czech Republic or to Bulgaria and got the visas simply by presenting their passports after they were asked to do so by those who are recruiting them. 
 
A lot of the Western diplomats work as spies for their countries, which provide information about their security services to Israel voluntarily, but most of the countries of Central Asia share security agreements with Israel. What is worse is that the major agents in economy and politics are not recruited by Bulgaria or France to work for the Mossad, but are being recruited by security services that belong to Islamic countries that provide security services to Israel in exchange for experience, training, technology and Israeli relations in Washington. 

Central Asia is a senior Israeli court that lacks any competitor facing the Zionist state, and most of the states that are cooperating with the Mossad are the devices and the diplomats of the state of Kazakhstan and its neighboring state Azerbaijan. 

Kazakhstan that is oil-rich have put its external security in the service of the Israelis, its diplomats are active in favor of the Mossad, and its consuls work around the world in the service of what gives them a common interest with the Kazakhs i.e. to satisfy Israel. Why not when the most important adviser to the president of Kazakhstan is an Israeli one wholeheartedly! 

Yet, are Syria, Egypt and Lebanon supervising the Kazakh consuls in our countries? Is Saeb Nahas who is close to the regime in Syria working in trade away from the Israeli threats or his relationship with Kazakhstan is protecting him from Israel and its role in hitting the nationalist Arab capitalists? Is he like the Consul of Kazakhstan in Syria who preserves his country’s interests or the Kazakhs are taking advantage of his close links with upper sources of influence in Syria and in the Lebanese resistance community to serve the interests of Israel? 
We are not accusing the man, for we have no proof but that to say that he accepted to remain to serve as a consul to Kazakhstan, despite knowing that this will involve him in dealing with Israelis somehow. How could he be working to strengthen the diplomacy of a country that all its diplomacy is in the service of Israel and he is not involved whether he knew this or no! As for the other suspect diplomat, he is the consul of Kazakhstan in Lebanon, Joseph Kanaan, who has been moving as a hornet suspiciously breeching all the Lebanese political, economic, security, military, and judicial sides and utilizing his personal relationships with them to get rid of the enemies of the Kazakh dictator who is collaborating with Israel. 

Those who know secret things say that some Lebanese security sides posses many of the documents and the follow-ups that condemn Joseph and accuse him of working for the benefit of the enemy through an ally that is Kazakhstan, and always whether he was aware of this or no, this changes nothing, as long as Joseph Kanaan is a man who deeply understands politics and its corridors and what proves this is that he has recruited high-level figures that are in charge of useful interests to work in favor of Kazakhstan ... As we have said ... that state has kept its security devices ready to serve the Mossad. 

Nevertheless, is Joseph Kanaan aware of what he is doing or no?? There are some factors that helped Israel to penetrate the Central Asian countries, and there are many factors that facilitated the task of “Israel” to penetrate the economies of the Central Asian countries, including: 
•    Welcoming the Zionist role in Central Asia by the U.S., and strengthened it politically and financially; since this role serves its interests, and comes in the framework of the strategies to dominate the region as one of the U.S. strategic backgrounds that aim at dominating the world. 

•    The lack of any account of historical enmity between the countries of Central Asia and the Zionist entity, what strengthens the prospects of joint cooperation and of transferring the Zionist technology to countries that are still being governed by backward patterns of development inherited from the communist era. 

•    The lack of an Arab-Islamic embracing of the Central Asian countries, while “Israel” is penetrating, being backed and supported by the West, especially by the United States, in order to tighten the control of the West over the area of oil away from the Russian and Arab influence. 

•    Turing from communism to liberalism in the Central Asian countries led those countries to rush to adopt the Western capitalist lifestyles, even if these patterns were just in a formal manner. 

•    The investment of strong and multi relations between Turkey and “Israel” to open the way in front of the Zionist entity to have access to the Asian depth; since Turkey has strong ties with Uzbekistan, what was as an initial, clear, and explicit green light for “Israel” in the region, especially in Kazakhstan, which owns approximately a quarter of the world reserves of uranium ore. In fact, this prompted “Israel” to consider this wealth as the wealth that has a nuclear threat, in light of the presence of Islamic states and movements in the region. Hence, “Israel” sought directly to purchase a complex to process uranium in Kazakhstan, which is considered one of the largest complexes of uranium in the world. 

•    “Israel” exploited the vacuum caused by the sudden collapse of the Soviet Union, as it rushed to recognize the countries of Central Asia, focused during the first phase of the history of its relations with those countries on the economic side, and sought to control the electronic elements of the Central Asian countries as a first stage. Then, it linked their economies to the Israeli economy, what makes any attempt to separate from them become extremely difficult, if not impossible, and that is why “Israel” does not provide any other forces with the opportunity to circumvent those countries economically. 
Comment